FAA says handling aircraft approval on its own would cost $1.8B

Speaking before a Senate hearing Wednesday, U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao stopped short of saying the government would require retrofitting of all aircraft with new safety features following two recent crashes involving Boeing 737 Max planes.

Senators grill aviation officials on their oversight of Boeing 737 Max jets

It would cost $1.8 billion and take 10,000 new employees for the U.S. aviation regulator to handle all aircraft certification internally, the agency’s chief told a Senate panel on Wednesday, answering questions following two Boeing 737 Max crashes on how new planes are approved for flight.

The Federal Aviation Administration delegates much of the work of airplane certification to manufacturers such as Boeing under a decades-old process.

The FAA’s acting head Daniel Elwell was asked why the FAA did not require disclosure of a new anti-stall software system in flight manuals or new pilot training before it certified the now-grounded 737 Max passenger jet in 2017.

Boeing said on Wednesday that it had reprogrammed software on its 737 Max passenger jet to prevent erroneous data from triggering an anti-stall system that is under mounting scrutiny following the two deadly nose-down crashes.

The aircraft maker said the anti-stall system, which is believed to have repeatedly forced the nose lower in at least one of the accidents, in Indonesia last October, would only do so one time after sensing a problem, giving pilots more control.

Boeing employees are pictured around a 737 Max 8 in Renton, Wash., on March 13, 2018.

Not ‘safety critical’

Elwell also said that an alert to pilots that Boeing was making standard on all 737 Max planes as part of a software upgrade was not “safety critical.” Boeing will stop charging for that alert and another still optional indicator.

“I find it hard to believe that a safety company like an airline would save a couple thousand dollars on an option that might improve safety,” Elwell said, who also defended the decision not to require new training after it was tested by pilots.

“Fundamentally, the aircraft layout, the handling and the performance of the aircraft was the same,” Elwell said.

In separate comments on Wednesday, U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao asked why Boeing did not require safety features on its top-selling 737 Max that might have prevented the crashes.

“It is very questionable if these were safety-oriented additions, why they were not part of the required template of measures that should go into an airplane,” Chao said, who added she was not ready to require that all safety options be retrofitted on existing airplanes.

‘Just wrong’ 

Shortly after Chao spoke, Boeing confirmed the company will make standard a safety feature on its 737 Max that might have warned earlier of problems that possibly played a role in the crashes of Indonesian and Ethiopian planes that killed almost 350 people.

Senator Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat, said she was considering introducing a bill that would require “key safety equipment” be included in basic plane sale costs.

Senator Joe Manchin, a Democrat and pilot, questioned Chao why it took the FAA so long to ground the 737 Max while regulators around the world moved faster to halt planes.

Family members leave flowers at the site of the Ethiopian Airlines, near the town of Bishoftu, southeast of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on March 13.

He also questioned why safety features were not mandated by Boeing or the FAA. “It looks like we are following,” Manchin said, adding it was “just wrong” not to require the alert.

At a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing on the Transportation Department’s budget, Chao said the issue will be reviewed by an outside committee and the department’s inspector general.

Chao said “it’s troubling that if indeed it was a safety feature that it was not included.”

error: Content is protected !!